Reconfiguring Relief Mechanisms: The Syrian Refugee Crisis in Lebanon

[Picture of the \"ghata\" model built on AUB campus for further testing and upgrading. Image by Rabih Shibli.] [Picture of the \"ghata\" model built on AUB campus for further testing and upgrading. Image by Rabih Shibli.]

Reconfiguring Relief Mechanisms: The Syrian Refugee Crisis in Lebanon

By : Jadaliyya Reports

The Issam Faris Institute (IFI) at the American University of Beirut (AUB) has released a report, authored by Rabih Shibli, the associate director for Development and Community Projects at AUB’s Center for Civic Engagement and Community Service. The report investigates the impacts of the Syrian refugee crisis in Lebanon, and advocates the reform of current relief mechanisms along more decentralized mechanisms. 

The report suggests establishing a new governance system at the level of the eight Lebanese mohafazat (governorates). It supports the establishment of a “Council of Mohafaza” which task would be to coordinate relief mechanisms comprehensively and efficiently, as explained below. 

The Council of Mohafaza Team (CMT) will chair coordination meetings with donors and relief agencies, and will allocate defined tasks to its supportive units to implement relief projects in partnership with the municipalities that host refugees. Due to their extensive knowledge in the field of relief and crisis management, UN agencies will have a significant role in the establishment of the units and in building personnel capacities. In order to respond to the escalating refugee crisis, seven units are required in order to set up a comprehensive and an efficient response mechanism:

Unit (1) Information Management and Coordination: This unit will follow up on the registration of refugees, collect data from local authorities and coordinate with Lebanese security divisions to facilitate the works of relief-working groups.

Unit (2) WASH (water, sanitation, hygiene and shelter): This unit will be responsible of implementing infrastructural works, rehabilitating unfinished buildings, and providing basic services in Informal Tented Settlements.

Unit (3) Child Protection and Gender Based Violence: This unit will curb violent practices against the most vulnerable groups among the refugees, and secure mental health assistance to traumatized victims.

Unit (4) Distribution of Food and Non-Food Items: This unit will handle the listing of all refugees according to age and gender groups in order to ensure smooth and transparent distribution of clothes, food rations, and the like.

Unit (5) Education: In addition to the formal educational process, literacy programs will be offered to refugees at all ages.

Unit (6) Health: Syrian physicians will assist locals MDs in the diagnosis and treatment of refugees needing medical treatment. Abiding by the Lebanese rules and regulation for medical practice, special permits will allow specialized Syrian MDs to carry out operations to refugees.  

Unit (7) Supporting Host Communities and Alleviating Tensions with Refugees: This will be achieved by engaging refugees in municipal public works along ecological lines. Universities will have a key role in conceptualizing strategies that will enable the implementation of this agenda.

The report suggests this schematic diagram for the proposed institutional structure overseeing this comprehensive relief mechanism. 

 \"\"

[Proposed institutional structure overseeing the proposed relief mechanism. Diagram by Rabih Shibli.]

In addition, the report “recommends engaging refugees in municipal public works along ecological lines, as a means to highlight self-reliance among the refugees’ communities and to alleviate rising tensions among refugees and the host communities.” The full report entitled Reconfiguring Relief Mechanisms: The Syrian Refugee Crisis in Lebanon is available here.

  • ALSO BY THIS AUTHOR

    • Teaching Palestine Today: Liberal Arts Context

      Teaching Palestine Today: Liberal Arts Context

      Join our first session of “Teaching Palestine Today” series. This session addresses the “Liberal Arts Context,” with Lara Deeb, Heather Ferguson, Amanda Lagji, and Leila Mansouri, moderated by Bassam Haddad. Four faculty members at the Claremont Colleges, a liberal arts consortium, discuss their approaches to including material on Palestine and Palestinian perspectives into classes in anthropology, history, postcolonial and decolonial literature, and creative writing. Topics addressed include classroom approaches, syllabi scaffolding, and strategies for building support beyond the classroom.

    • Open Letter to Chancellor Julio Frenk From the Ucla Task Force on Anti-Palestinian, Anti-Muslim and Anti-Arab Racism

      Open Letter to Chancellor Julio Frenk From the Ucla Task Force on Anti-Palestinian, Anti-Muslim and Anti-Arab Racism
      Today, Thursday, March 20, 35 plaintiffs - made up of faculty, students, journalists, and legal observers filed the largest civil rights suit to date in defense of Palestine solidarity activism on a university campus. The suit names UCLA & UC administration, multiple police agencies, and individuals from the mob attack on the Palestine Solidarity Encampment as defendants. It seeks to hold accountable those who engaged in violence, harassment, and intimidation against Palestine solidarity activists and to remedy the failure to protect them. 
    • Long Form Podcast: Episode 3 — Dismantling International Law Featuring Francesca Albanese

      Long Form Podcast: Episode 3 — Dismantling International Law Featuring Francesca Albanese

      In this episode of Long Form Podcast, Francesca Albanese reflects on the campaign by Israel and the United States to dismantle international law and the institutions established to uphold it, the complicity and hypocrisy of their allies, and the efforts to silence her own work and that of others in support of Palestinian human rights.

Past is Present: Settler Colonialism Matters!

On 5-6 March 2011, the Palestine Society at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) in London will hold its seventh annual conference, "Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine." This year`s conference aims to understand Zionism as a settler colonial project which has, for more than a century, subjected Palestine and Palestinians to a structural and violent form of destruction, dispossession, land appropriation and erasure in the pursuit of a new Jewish Israeli society. By organizing this conference, we hope to reclaim and revive the settler colonial paradigm and to outline its potential to inform and guide political strategy and mobilization.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is often described as unique and exceptional with little resemblance to other historical or ongoing colonial conflicts. Yet, for Zionism, like other settler colonial projects such as the British colonization of Ireland or European settlement of North America, South Africa or Australia, the imperative is to control the land and its resources -- and to displace the original inhabitants. Indeed, as conference keynote speaker Patrick Wolfe, one of the foremost scholars on settler colonialism and professor at La Trobe University in Victoria, Australia, argues, "the logic of this project, a sustained institutional tendency to eliminate the Indigenous population, informs a range of historical practices that might otherwise appear distinct--invasion is a structure not an event."[i]

Therefore, the classification of the Zionist movement as a settler colonial project, and the Israeli state as its manifestation, is not merely intended as a statement on the historical origins of Israel, nor as a rhetorical or polemical device. Rather, the aim is to highlight Zionism`s structural continuities and the ideology which informs Israeli policies and practices in Palestine and toward Palestinians everywhere. Thus, the Nakba -- whether viewed as a spontaneous, violent episode in war, or the implementation of a preconceived master plan -- should be understood as both the precondition for the creation of Israel and the logical outcome of Zionist settlement in Palestine.

Moreover, it is this same logic that sustains the continuation of the Nakba today. As remarked by Benny Morris, “had he [David Ben Gurion] carried out full expulsion--rather than partial--he would have stabilised the State of Israel for generations.”[ii] Yet, plagued by an “instability”--defined by the very existence of the Palestinian nation--Israel continues its daily state practices in its quest to fulfill Zionism’s logic to maximize the amount of land under its control with the minimum number of Palestinians on it. These practices take a painful array of manifestations: aerial and maritime bombardment, massacre and invasion, house demolitions, land theft, identity card confiscation, racist laws and loyalty tests, the wall, the siege on Gaza, cultural appropriation, and the dependence on willing (or unwilling) native collaboration and security arrangements, all with the continued support and backing of imperial power. 

Despite these enduring practices however, the settler colonial paradigm has largely fallen into disuse. As a paradigm, it once served as a primary ideological and political framework for all Palestinian political factions and trends, and informed the intellectual work of committed academics and revolutionary scholars, both Palestinians and Jews.

The conference thus asks where and why the settler colonial paradigm was lost, both in scholarship on Palestine and in politics; how do current analyses and theoretical trends that have arisen in its place address present and historical realities? While acknowledging the creativity of these new interpretations, we must nonetheless ask: when exactly did Palestinian natives find themselves in a "post-colonial" condition? When did the ongoing struggle over land become a "post-conflict" situation? When did Israel become a "post-Zionist" society? And when did the fortification of Palestinian ghettos and reservations become "state-building"?

In outlining settler colonialism as a central paradigm from which to understand Palestine, this conference re-invigorates it as a tool by which to analyze the present situation. In doing so, it contests solutions which accommodate Zionism, and more significantly, builds settler colonialism as a political analysis that can embolden and inform a strategy of active, mutual, and principled Palestinian alignment with the Arab struggle for self-determination, and indigenous struggles in the US, Latin America, Oceania, and elsewhere.

Such an alignment would expand the tools available to Palestinians and their solidarity movement, and reconnect the struggle to its own history of anti-colonial internationalism. At its core, this internationalism asserts that the Palestinian struggle against Zionist settler colonialism can only be won when it is embedded within, and empowered by, the broader Arab movement for emancipation and the indigenous, anti-racist and anti-colonial movement--from Arizona to Auckland.

SOAS Palestine Society invites everyone to join us at what promises to be a significant intervention in Palestine activism and scholarship.

For over 30 years, SOAS Palestine Society has heightened awareness and understanding of the Palestinian people, their rights, culture, and struggle for self-determination, amongst students, faculty, staff, and the broader public. SOAS Palestine society aims to continuously push the frontiers of discourse in an effort to make provocative arguments and to stimulate debate and organizing for justice in Palestine through relevant conferences, and events ranging from the intellectual and political impact of Edward Said`s life and work (2004), international law and the Palestine question (2005), the economy of Palestine and its occupation (2006), the one state (2007), 60 Years of Nakba, 60 Years of Resistance (2009), and most recently, the Left in Palestine (2010).

For more information on the SOAS Palestine Society 7th annual conference, Past is Present: Settler Colonialism in Palestine: www.soaspalsoc.org

SOAS Palestine Society Organizing Collective is a group of committed students that has undertaken to organize annual academic conferences on Palestine since 2003.

 


[i] Patrick Wolfe, Settler Colonialism and the Transformation of Anthropology: The Politics and Poetics of an Ethnographic Event, Cassell, London, p. 163

[ii] Interview with Benny Morris, Survival of the Fittest, Haaretz, 9. January 2004, http://cosmos.ucc.ie/cs1064/jabowen/IPSC/php/art.php?aid=5412